Skip to content

Compare RPC performance across popular chains

See how different providers compare on latency, reliability and failed requests, all tested under identical conditions.

Global Average Response Time

Live

Last updated: Jun 26, 2026, 16:51 UTC

Alchemy0.00 ms
QuickNode0.00 ms
Infura0.00 ms
dRPC0.00 ms

Average response time across all methods in the current global benchmark window.

Chain
Region

Average Latency

0.00ms

Alchemy

P50 Latency

0.00ms

Alchemy

P95 Latency

0.00ms

Alchemy

Success Rate

0%

Alchemy

ProviderAvg latencyP50 latencyP95 latencySuccess rate
AlchemyFastest
15.87 ms
5.95 ms
30.61 ms
100%
QuickNode
45.19 ms
15.42 ms
180.14 ms
100%
Infura
113.97 ms
93.34 ms
276.08 ms
100%
dRPC
130.20 ms
25.06 ms
661.06 ms
99.46%

Average latency by method

How fast each provider handles a specific request type across all regions. Pick a method to compare.

8.52 ms
17.39 ms
20.08 ms
107.18 ms
  • Alchemy
  • dRPC
  • QuickNode
  • Infura

Failed requests by method

Which request types each provider struggles with across all regions. Pick a method to see where errors pile up.

0
9
47
72
  • Alchemy
  • QuickNode
  • Infura
  • dRPC

Methodology

Same test, same rules, every provider

Every provider is measured under identical conditions, so the numbers stay comparable and hard to game.

Cadence icon

Tested every 10 seconds

Common EVM RPC methods run against each provider on the same fixed cadence, around the clock.

Regions icon

Four global regions

Latency and success rate are measured from US East, US West, EU Central, and AP Southeast.

Accounts icon

Standard paid accounts

Every provider is tested on the same standard paid RPC service tier, with no special treatment.

Method set icon

Same method set

Every provider is hit with the same mix of common EVM calls, from simple reads to heavy getLogs queries.

Failure rules icon

Clear failure rules

Non-200 HTTP responses, non-zero RPC statuses, and requests over 8 seconds all count as failures.

Transparent results icon

Transparent results

Raw benchmark data is published as machine-readable tables, so anyone can audit and reproduce the numbers.

Benchmarks for agents

The companion Markdown page returns this data as text tables with field definitions and source metadata, built for agents, crawlers, and anyone who wants the data without the interface.

Open Markdown data

Latency is a tax on every request

Slow RPC makes everything slower. Slower reads, slower UIs, slower confirmations, until users give up. Build on the infrastructure that leads these benchmarks.